🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.